Matches / Upcoming / Eternal Fire vs CYBERSHOKE
Prediction
Our model gives Eternal Fire a 56% chance to beat CYBERSHOKE at European Pro League Series 8. Bookmakers price Eternal Fire at 1.82 and CYBERSHOKE at 1.89 (implied 51% vs 49%).
FormatBO3Form38-28 · 29-26Likely mapsMirage · Dust2 · Anubis
Model read: track record · HLTV rank · firepower · form, weighted by sample size. All figures respect the data-range filter.
Recent form
Eternal Fire
Head-to-head
past meetings & common opponents◂ ETE fared bettervs 8 shared opponentsCYB fared better ▸
magic#200-20-2
Eternal Fire vs magic
May 2LMirage2-13Dust24-13CYBERSHOKE vs magic
Apr 4LMirage4-13Dust26-13
Inner Circle#320-20-2
Eternal Fire vs Inner Circle
Feb 15LAncient12-16Mirage9-13CYBERSHOKE vs Inner Circle
Feb 11LDust26-13Mirage11-13
Nemesis#332-02-2
Eternal Fire vs Nemesis
Mar 14WDust213-11Ancient13-4
K27#381-21-2
Eternal Fire vs K27
Mar 18LAncient13-6Mirage2-13Dust210-13CYBERSHOKE vs K27
Mar 4LDust22-13Nuke13-11Mirage4-13
Acend#425-34-1
Nuclear TigeRES#442-00-2
Eternal Fire vs Nuclear TigeRES
May 12WDust213-11Ancient13-9CYBERSHOKE vs Nuclear TigeRES
Jun 8LDust28-13Anubis4-13EX-ex-RUBY#493-03-4
100 Thieves#600-20-2
Eternal Fire vs 100 Thieves
Feb 27LInferno11-13Dust29-13CYBERSHOKE vs 100 Thieves
Feb 27LAncient8-13Dust211-13Eternal Fire 13-11combined map recordCYBERSHOKE 10-17edge · Eternal Fire
Firepower
roster ratingsEternal Fire · avg 1.22 · top +0.59
| Player | Mp | K-D | ADR | KAST | HS | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kvem | 4 | 1.58 | 112.1 | 81.2% | 58% | 1.81 |
| jottAAA | 114 | 1.15 | 82.3 | 73% | 60% | 1.22 |
| regali | 47 | 1.19 | 72.2 | 71.9% | 38% | 1.11 |
| MisteM | 47 | 0.89 | 66.9 | 69.7% | 58% | 1.02 |
| br0 | 4 | 0.88 | 61.1 | 75.9% | 48% | 0.95 |
CYBERSHOKE · avg 1.14 · top +0.09
| Player | Mp | K-D | ADR | KAST | HS | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaren | 18 | 1.23 | 74.8 | 73.1% | 35% | 1.23 |
| glowiing | 117 | 1.09 | 83 | 73% | 58% | 1.2 |
| Mokuj1n | 117 | 1.1 | 75.4 | 73.7% | 57% | 1.16 |
| bl1x1 | 117 | 0.98 | 71.2 | 74.7% | 65% | 1.13 |
| alpha | 117 | 0.92 | 70.4 | 72.8% | 50% | 1 |
Projected veto
likely picks & bansVeto read
CYBERSHOKE habitually bans Inferno, Eternal Fire's strongest maps (Overpass, Inferno all ≥60%).
That's a standing habit (Inferno 48/53), not an opponent read, so expect Eternal Fire to fight the veto for Mirage.
Plays: Mirage · Dust2 · Anubis · Removed: Nuke · Inferno · Ancient · Overpass
every map shows both teams' win% (ETE / CYB)
1ETERNAL FIRE BAN
Nukeproj. removed
ETE
46%
6-7CYB
53%
8-7
ETE
46%
6-7
CYB
53%
8-7
2CYBERSHOKE BAN
Infernoproj. removed
ETE
60%
6-4CYB
n/a
0g
ETE
60%
6-4
CYB
n/a
0g
Eternal Fire on Inferno
W
aimclub
13–3
4mo ago
L
Passion UA
8–13
4mo ago
W
Drama
13–11
4mo ago
W
ECSTATIC
13–8
4mo ago
W
MANA
13–5
4mo ago
L
Acend
6–13
4mo ago
L
FAVBET
11–13
4mo ago
W
megoshort
13–6
5mo agoCYBERSHOKE on Inferno
no recent maps
3ETERNAL FIRE PICK
Mirage
ETE
55%
23-19CYB
46%
11-13
ETE
55%
23-19
CYB
46%
11-13
4CYBERSHOKE PICK
Dust2
ETE
57%
21-16CYB
54%
19-16
ETE
57%
21-16
CYB
54%
19-16
5ETERNAL FIRE BAN
Ancientproj. removed
ETE
48%
11-12CYB
72%
18-7
ETE
48%
11-12
CYB
72%
18-7
6CYBERSHOKE BAN
Overpassproj. removed
ETE
70%
7-3CYB
40%
4-6
ETE
70%
7-3
CYB
40%
4-6
7DECIDER
Anubisleft over
ETE
54%
7-6CYB
38%
3-5
ETE
54%
7-6
CYB
38%
3-5
Projected from each team's veto habits (BO3), assuming Eternal Fire vetoes first.
Usual first ban: Eternal Fire Nuke · CYBERSHOKE Inferno.
Map lab
pick the 3 maps · per-map H2H + predictionlayout
Pick 3 maps ✓
Best-case draws · each side’s strongest realistic Bo3 · tap to load
The veto swings it: Eternal Fire 72% on their maps vs CYBERSHOKE 64% on theirs. Whoever shapes the pool is favoured. Inferno (50%) is the closest to a toss-up.
Eternal Fire62%to win the seriesclear pickiMap edgesMirage: Eternal Fire 58% · Dust2: Eternal Fire 52% toss-up · Anubis: Eternal Fire 63%WhyEternal Fire hold the edge across the maps (3 of 3 lean their way).OutcomesEternal Fire 62%: 2-1 31%, 2-0 31% · CYBERSHOKE 38%: 2-0 20%, 2-1 18%
series odds add up every way a team can win, not just one scoreline
series odds add up every way a team can win, not just one scoreline
Eternal Fire 62%38% CYBERSHOKE
Eternal Fire are the clearer side here: the most likely result is Eternal Fire 2-1.
MirageETE v CYB
58%42%
23-19record11-13
55%win46%
56%CT win57%
45%T win40%
56%pistol42%
81%convert75%
Dust2ETE v CYB
52%48%
21-16record19-16
57%win54%
50%CT win58%
55%T win46%
43%pistol54%
91%convert82%
AnubisETE v CYB
63%37%
7-6record3-5
54%win38%
47%CT win47%
59%T win46%
58%pistol69%
80%convert60%
Pistol, eco & sides
win% · convert if won · eco if lost · CT/T per mapct / t side win% (Nuke skews CT, Dust2 T)pistol won the opening pistolconv then won round 2eco lost pistol, won round 2
Map
ETEct
ETEt
CYBct
CYBt
ETEpistol
ETEconv
ETEeco
CYBpistol
CYBconv
CYBeco
Miragepool
56%229/409
45%207/461
57%148/259
40%92/228
56%47/84
81%38/47
32%12/37
42%20/48
75%15/20
18%5/28
Dust2pool
50%192/385
55%217/394
58%184/320
46%178/388
43%32/74
91%29/32
14%6/42
54%38/70
82%31/38
22%7/32
Anubispool
47%61/130
59%79/133
47%35/74
46%34/74
58%15/26
80%12/15
18%2/11
69%11/16
60%6/10
40%2/5
Nukeban
52%79/152
46%57/124
55%91/164
46%68/148
46%12/26
92%11/12
36%5/14
77%23/30
91%20/22
14%1/7
Infernoban
52%54/103
58%60/104
n/a
n/a
35%7/20
86%6/7
23%3/13
n/a
n/a
n/a
Ancientban
58%148/254
45%105/232
54%133/246
60%150/248
52%24/46
96%23/24
32%7/22
66%33/50
88%29/33
24%4/17
Overpassban
57%68/120
48%49/103
60%70/116
43%40/94
50%10/20
90%9/10
20%2/10
60%12/20
75%9/12
0%0/8
colour = vs league averagebelowavgabove
Pistols
Pistol rounds are a tie. Both win about the same (Eternal Fire 51%, CYBERSHOKE 51%). Nobody has an edge.
After pistol
Win the pistol → Eternal Fire usually win the next round too (84% vs 76%). Lose the pistol → both fight back about the same (22% vs 22%).
Mentality & map flow
comebacks, blown leadsMargins
Eternal Fire average a 5-round margin (25 blown, biggest 7); CYBERSHOKE average 5.9 (15 blown, 11 OTs). Hover any ⓘ for the matches behind it.
Eternal Fire
Comebacks (won from 3+ down)i28/82 (34%)Comebacks (won from 3+ down)Of the 82 maps they won, 28 (34%) were won after trailing by 3+ rounds. So 34% of their wins were comebacks, not 34% of all games.vs LilmixDust2from 7 downvs FAVBETOverpassfrom 6 downvs DramaInfernofrom 6 downvs OramondAncientfrom 5 downvs MANAMiragefrom 5 down
Leads blown (lost from 3+ up)i25/67 (37%)Leads blown (lost from 3+ up)Of the 67 maps they lost, 25 (37%) were lost after leading by 3+ rounds: leads they threw away.vs ARCREDDust2led 7 · lost 13-16vs Inner CircleAncientled 6 · lost 12-16vs BIG AcademyDust2led 6 · lost 11-13vs OxujiAncientled 5 · lost 10-13vs AcendAncientled 5 · lost 7-13
Biggest comebackifrom 7 downBiggest comebackLargest deficit erased to win a map.vs LilmixDust2from 7 down · won 16-14
Biggest lead blowni7 roundsBiggest lead blownLargest lead held and still lost.vs ARCREDDust2led 7 · lost 13-16
Avg map margini5 roundsAvg map marginAverage round difference across maps.
Close maps (≤3) · OTi34% · 14Close maps (≤3) · OT34% of their maps were decided by ≤3 rounds (nailbiters); 14 went to overtime.vs AcendOverpass16-14vs ARCREDDust213-16vs Inner CircleAncient12-16vs HYPERSPIRITMirage16-12vs FlyQuestMirage14-16
CYBERSHOKE
Comebacks (won from 3+ down)i13/63 (21%)Comebacks (won from 3+ down)Of the 63 maps they won, 13 (21%) were won after trailing by 3+ rounds. So 21% of their wins were comebacks, not 21% of all games.vs PhantomDust2from 7 downvs ENCEDust2from 5 downvs AcendDust2from 5 downvs EYEBALLERSDust2from 5 downvs OramondDust2from 5 down
Leads blown (lost from 3+ up)i15/54 (28%)Leads blown (lost from 3+ up)Of the 54 maps they lost, 15 (28%) were lost after leading by 3+ rounds: leads they threw away.vs AMOverpassled 9 · lost 12-16vs ASTRALDust2led 7 · lost 11-13vs Inner CircleMirageled 5 · lost 11-13vs BIGOverpassled 5 · lost 7-13vs ex-Zero TenacityMirageled 5 · lost 10-13
Biggest comebackifrom 7 downBiggest comebackLargest deficit erased to win a map.vs PhantomDust2from 7 down · won 28-26
Biggest lead blowni9 roundsBiggest lead blownLargest lead held and still lost.vs AMOverpassled 9 · lost 12-16
Avg map margini5.9 roundsAvg map marginAverage round difference across maps.
Close maps (≤3) · OTi31% · 11Close maps (≤3) · OT31% of their maps were decided by ≤3 rounds (nailbiters); 11 went to overtime.vs ENCEDust216-13vs HEROICDust213-16vs PhantomDust228-26vs MOUZ NXTAncient16-13vs AcendAncient19-17
Eternal Fire vs CYBERSHOKE FAQ
Who is favored to win Eternal Fire vs CYBERSHOKE?
Eternal Fire are favored with a 56% model win probability, and are the bookmakers' favorite too.
What are the betting odds for Eternal Fire vs CYBERSHOKE?
Bookmakers price Eternal Fire at 1.82 and CYBERSHOKE at 1.89 (implied 51% vs 49%).
When do Eternal Fire and CYBERSHOKE play?
Eternal Fire vs CYBERSHOKE is scheduled for 2026-07-22 10:30 UTC at European Pro League Series 8.