
paiN are favoured: our model gives them 54% against Back to Back. Bookmakers lean paiN at 84%. Record slightly favours Back to Back, form clearly favours Back to Back, firepower clearly favours Back to Back.
One number from the signals below. Each row shows which side it pulls toward and how hard; the weights are learned from every match in our history (team strength and roster rating do most of the work), and the blend is shrunk toward the betting market based on how much data backs it, so a thin sample can never read as a lock.
Bookmakers imply 84% for paiN (1.1 / 5.75); we land 30 points lower at 54%: that gap is where we think the value is. This read is 84% our own signal (124 maps of paiN, 21 of Back to Back).
Bottom line: paiN to beat Back to Back, barely: a coin flip with a lean. Everything below is the data behind that call.
Fluxo#582-00-2
Bounty Hunters#1092-12-2
METANOIA Wolves#2152-04-1
DASH2-00-4A hypothetical veto for this matchup, projected from how each team has picked and banned before (Bo3, paiN vetoes first). It's a guide to the likely map pool and each side's win% on those maps, not a guarantee: teams adapt to the opponent and the event.
METANOIA Wolves13–66mo ago
HOTU11–136d agoL
9z3–1327d agoL
3DMAX10–132mo agoL
Sharks11–132mo agoThree ways the map pool could fall: each side's best-case Bo3 and the most likely draw. Pick a card to load its series odds and the map-by-map head-to-head underneath.