Lavked are favoured: our model gives them 67% against Saint Sinners. Bookmakers lean Lavked at 66%. Strength slightly favours Lavked, record clearly favours Lavked, form slightly favours Lavked, firepower clearly favours Lavked.
Likely mapsMirage · Dust2 · Nuke
How the model gets there
One number from the signals below. Each row shows which side it pulls toward and how hard; the weights are learned from every match in our history (team strength and roster rating do most of the work), and the blend is shrunk toward the betting market based on how much data backs it, so a thin sample can never read as a lock.
LavkedpullSaint Sinners
Team strength1518
147160/40 LAV
Track record56–43
1–472/28 LAV
Recent formLWWWL
WLLLL61/39 LAV
Roster rating1.19
1.0490/10 LAV
The market agrees: bookmakers imply 66% for Lavked (1.39 / 2.65) and we land at 67%, the same read. This read is 74% our own signal (237 maps of Lavked, 11 of Saint Sinners).
Bottom line: Lavked to beat Saint Sinners, and we're comfortable saying so. Everything below is the data behind that call.
Firepower
roster ratings
Lavked · avg 1.19 · star gap +0.15iStar gap: the best player rates 0.15 above the team average. A big gap means the team leans on one star; a small one means the firepower is spread out.
Saint Sinners · avg 1.04 · star gap +0.21iStar gap: the best player rates 0.21 above the team average. A big gap means the team leans on one star; a small one means the firepower is spread out.
No prior meetings or shared opponents in the sampled window.
Map lab
Lavked54%to win the Bo3 · most likely Lavked 2-0
If the veto goes
Lavked 54%how the series ends46% Saint Sinners
29%2-021%
25%2-125%
Map 1MirageLavked pick
Lavked60%39-29vsSaint Sinners40%0-2
57%Win0%
56%CT18%
47%T50%
48%Pistol50%
77%Conv50%
Map 2Dust2Saint Sinners pick
Lavked48%22-20vsSaint Sinners52%1-0
52%Win100%
52%CT90%
52%T33%
50%Pistol50%
81%Conv100%
Map 3Nukedecider
Lavked50%30-20vsSaint Sinners50%2-1
60%Win67%
57%CT56%
47%T52%
47%Pistol50%
85%Conv100%
Pistol, eco & sides
who wins pistols, what happens next, which side each team owns
CT side / T side rounds won on that side · Pistol opening pistol rounds won · After win won the round right after taking the pistol · After loss won the round right after losing it. Colour is the value against the league average on that map: above average below, and the tick marks the average.
LavkedMirageSaint Sinners
56%CT side18%
47%T side50%
48%Pistol50%
77%After win50%
14%After loss0%
LavkedDust2Saint Sinners
52%CT side90%
52%T side33%
50%Pistol50%
81%After win100%
19%After loss0%
LavkedNukeSaint Sinners
57%CT side56%
47%T side52%
47%Pistol50%
85%After win100%
17%After loss0%
Pistol rounds48% · 50% · level, no edge
After a won pistol80% · 83% · both convert about the same
After a lost pistol16% · 0% · Lavked fight back and win the next round more often
Projected veto
likely picks & bans
ihow this projection works
A hypothetical veto for this matchup, projected from how each team has picked and banned before (Bo3, Lavked vetoes first). It's a guide to the likely map pool and each side's win% on those maps, not a guarantee: teams adapt to the opponent and the event.
Saint Sinners habitually bans Ancient, Lavked's strongest maps (Ancient, Nuke all ≥60%). That's a standing habit (Ancient 3/5), not an opponent read, so expect Lavked to fight the veto for Mirage.
Comebacks (won from 3+ down)i2/3 (67%)Comebacks (won from 3+ down)Of the 3 maps they won, 2 (67%) were won after trailing by 3+ rounds. So 67% of their wins were comebacks, not 67% of all games.vs PermittaNukefrom 5 downvs PermittaDust2from 4 down