

Too close to call. Our model has it 51–49. Bookmakers lean G2 at 53%. Form slightly favours PARIVISION.
One number from the signals below. Each row shows which side it pulls toward and how hard; the weights are learned from every match in our history (team strength and roster rating do most of the work), and the blend is shrunk toward the betting market based on how much data backs it, so a thin sample can never read as a lock.
Bookmakers imply 47% for PARIVISION (1.98 / 1.78); we land 4 points higher at 51%: that gap is where we think the value is. This read is 97% our own signal (161 maps of PARIVISION, 187 of G2). Head-to-head they've met 3 times: PARIVISION leads 2–1.
Bottom line: PARIVISION to beat G2, barely: a coin flip with a lean. Everything below is the data behind that call.
PARIVISION2 : 1
G2◆ same lineup5mo ago
PARIVISION1 : 2
G2!
PARIVISION2 : 1
G2!
Spirit#15-32-12
Vitality#20-73-6
Aurora#52-34-5
Falcons#67-11-4
Legacy#74-82-5
BETBOOM#91-22-1CT side / T side rounds won on that side · Pistol opening pistol rounds won · After win won the round right after taking the pistol · After loss won the round right after losing it. Colour is the value against the league average on that map: above average below, and the tick marks the average.
A hypothetical veto for this matchup, projected from how each team has picked and banned before (Bo3, PARIVISION vetoes first). It's a guide to the likely map pool and each side's win% on those maps, not a guarantee: teams adapt to the opponent and the event.